Can we separate the blocksize ‘debate’ from a SegWit upgrade?

Ticker

1 BTC = $39325.32 USD  (via Coinbase)
1 ETH = $2366.76 USD  (via Coinbase)
1 LTC = $138.03 USD  (via Coinbase)
Quotes delayed up to 2 minutes.

1 CRYPTO

Crypto News & ICO Reviews

1 News - 247 News - 247 Bitcoin - 1 Search

BTC - BCH - ETH - LITE - XRP

Buy Sell Trade Crypto Here

 

Some of the benefits of SegWit include:

  • Malleability Fixes.
  • Linear scaling of sighash operations.
  • Signing of input values.
  • Increased security for multisig via pay-to-script-hash (P2SH).
  • Script versioning.
  • Reducing UTXO growth.
  • Efficiency gains when not verifying signatures.

Regardless of your position on block size surely there would be unanimous support for these features/fixes/improvements?

Can we change the narrative going forward to unite all bitcoiners on this as a separate technical issue, and debate a block size/hardfork on its own merits?

submitted by /u/101111
[link] [comments]

1 CRYPTO

Crypto News & ICO Reviews

1 News - 247 News - 247 Bitcoin - 1 Search

BTC - BCH - ETH - LITE - XRP

Buy Sell Trade Crypto Here

 

Ticker

1 BTC = $39325.32 USD  (via Coinbase)
1 ETH = $2367.38 USD  (via Coinbase)
1 LTC = $138.14 USD  (via Coinbase)
Quotes delayed up to 2 minutes.

Leave a Reply